FundedFirm logo
← Back to Knowledge CenterProp Trading Firms

FundedFirm: when $95M in payouts turned out to be fake, and the company simply corrected the figure

The company claimed $95 million in payouts to traders and over 700,000 participants in just a few months of operation. These figures contrasted starkly with only 2,700 Instagram followers and a handful of Trustpilot reviews. In November 2024, YouTube blogger Rohit Kumar proved that the FundedFirm website was effectively a copy of competitor FundedNext's site.

FundedFirm promoted itself as a fast-growing prop firm supposedly based in the UAE, offering instant access to "funded" trading accounts. Promotion was carried out aggressively through financial influencers who, according to subsequent investigations, were provided with pre-populated demo "funded" accounts — while the company's claimed scale metrics (millions in payouts, hundreds of thousands of participants) did not align with its meager organic social-media activity and only a few Trustpilot reviews, which moreover appeared in suspiciously clustered batches in August and November 2024.

On 23 November 2024, blogger Rohit Kumar published an investigation titled "Biggest Scam in Prop Firm History," in which he showed that FundedFirm's marketing content and website design were almost entirely copied from competitor FundedNext's site. In addition, the company's claimed registration in the UAE was not confirmed in any of the emirate's state registries — verifying the firm's legal status proved impossible.

After the investigation was made public, the company quietly reduced its claimed payout figure from $95 million to $9.5 million — exactly tenfold, without any public explanation for the discrepancy. According to specialist outlets, the company's declared assets effectively "vanished overnight" immediately after the exposure.

There were no official regulatory sanctions against FundedFirm — largely because the inability to confirm the company's legal registration complicates any procedural prosecution. The victims were mainly traders from developing countries who paid skills-evaluation fees and received no path to recovering their funds.

Why this mattersAlways check a company's marketing claims against independent, easily verifiable data. Copying a competitor's website design and an unconfirmed legal registration are serious red flags visible even before any money is invested. Carrara e Associati regularly checks such discrepancies for clients before they commit funds — a quick check of a company's public data costs far less than a lost deposit.

Published 15 December 2024

Does your situation resemble this case?

Tell us briefly, we'll help →